In the context of aviation, what is an example of an ultrahazardous activity that can result in strict liability?

An ultrahazardous activity is one that inherently poses a significant risk of harm to people or property, even when all precautions are taken. Spraying pesticides is considered such an activity because it involves the use of chemicals that can be toxic, hazardous to health, and potentially harmful to the environment. The risk associated with these activities is substantial, making the person or entity conducting the spraying strictly liable for any resulting damages or injuries, regardless of the level of care exercised. This strict liability doctrine serves to protect the public from the dangers posed by these inherently risky activities.

In contrast, flying commercial aircraft, driving trucks, and building homes, while they may involve risks and require adherence to safety regulations, do not fall under the category of ultrahazardous activities as defined in this context. These activities do not carry the same level of inherent risk that could result in strict liability simply due to their nature, especially when standard precautions and regulations are followed.